전문대학 교원의 직무능력 향상을 위한 연수 프로그램 개발(Ⅱ)

Abstract

본 연구는 전문대학 교원이 수행해야 하는 직무를 규명하고, 현장 교원들의 직무에 대한 인식을 분석하여 체계적인 교육 기회를 마련하기 위한 기초자료를 제공하며, 이를 통해 교원 관리의 지침이 될 수 있는 직무수행 기준(안)을 개발·제시하고자 하였다. 또한 이 연구의 궁극적인 목적은 개발된 전문대학 교원의 직무수행 기준을 기초로 전문대학 교원의 직무능력 향상을 위한 연수 프로그램 개발 (Ⅰ) 연구에서 개발된 교원 연수 프로그램의 적정성을 검토하여 교원들의 경력 및 교육 특성을 고려한 연수 이수 모형 및 연수 운영 방안을 제시하는 데 있다.

This study intends to define the duties of Junior College professors in relation to study (Ⅰ), analyze their understanding of their current duties, and finally suggest improvements in the work performance standards designed to provide systematic educational opportunities. Based on this, the main objectives of this study include a review of the feasibility of the professor training programs suggested in study (Ⅰ) and the formulation of suggestions as to how these training models can be adjusted to professors individual characteristics and operation methods. In order to achieve the objectives mentioned above, this study defined, based on the educational environment of junior colleges, potential professors duties apt to be changed. Furthermore, this study analyzed the current status of junior college professors, as well as the actual management conditions. Also defined were junior college professors duties based on their actual work duties. An analysis of professors understanding of their duties, utilization of work performance standards, and training demands was also carried out. In addition, this study examined how appropriate the training programs developed in study (I) are, and presented a professors training program as well as models to improve professors professional lives. These models are based on teaching skills related to the training demands made by junior college professors and on teaching standards. The subjects of this study involved only full-time professors and excluded deans and teaching assistants. Of special importance is the fact that these professors training programs were developed in a non- course specific manner, focusing rather on work requirements common to all subjects. This study used such methods as: analysis of documents and data, group interviews, work analysis along with Delphi studies, expert committees, interviews and surveys. ...